Accountability is the foundation of any high-performing team, but some employees consistently struggle with it. This isn’t always intentional—some employees are unaware of their accountability gaps, while others actively avoid responsibility. Leaders tend to encounter two main types:

This often stems from a lack of resilience. Employees who haven’t had to push through difficult experiences may see constructive feedback as an attack rather than an opportunity to improve. While this isn’t limited to a specific generation, younger employees—particularly those with less experience—are sometimes more prone to this reaction.

Not all underperformers are the same. Some are disengaged and put in minimal effort, while others work hard but still produce low-quality results. Leaders typically encounter two main types:

Some employees can rationalize their way out of any responsibility. It’s never their fault—there was miscommunication, bad timing, unclear expectations, or someone else dropped the ball. They always have a reason why things didn’t go as planned, and no matter how obvious their role in the problem is, they’ll never acknowledge it.

Excuse-makers are particularly frustrating because they resist self-reflection. If they never look in the mirror and take ownership, they’ll never take the next step toward solving the issue. And the worst part? Excuse-making almost always overlaps with another problem—whether it’s poor performance, a lack of accountability, or even a toxic attitude.

Toxic employees are tricky because they’re often good at their jobs. They deliver results, but they drag down everyone around them. They’re the black cloud in the office—bitter, cynical, and constantly undermining morale. Sometimes, their attitude comes from feeling overlooked for a promotion or slighted in some way. Other times, they’ve just been around too long and let resentment build up.

These employees don’t get the same scrutiny as underperformers because they’re technically doing their job. But if they’re creating friction, stalling momentum, or spreading negativity, they’re just as much of a liability. And the impact isn’t just anecdotal—a study published in the Journal of Applied Psychology found that workplace rudeness can severely harm team effectiveness, particularly in high-stakes industries where collaboration is essential. Toxic behaviors don’t just make work unpleasant; they actively reduce team performance and decision-making quality.

Some people are great cultural fits but completely wrong for the job they’re in. They’re positive, enthusiastic, and eager to learn—but no matter how much training or support they get, they just can’t seem to perform at the level needed.

This happens all the time. Someone interviews well, seems like they’d be a great addition, and then struggles once they’re in the role. It’s not a laziness or attitude problem—it’s just a mismatch. And it’s one of the hardest situations to deal with because we want them to succeed. We like them. We see their potential. But at some point, we have to accept that effort doesn’t always translate to results.

Some employees struggle at work because their personal life is a complete disaster. And to be fair, some of those struggles are real—people go through major life events that genuinely affect their ability to function. But there’s another kind of employee who’s always in chaos, not because of some life-altering tragedy, but because they can’t get basic habits in order. They’re late every morning because they can’t stop playing video games the night before. They’re scattered and disorganized because they don’t know how to manage their time. And, inevitably, their personal issues spill into work, creating constant distractions.

The impact of personal struggles on job performance is real— for example, a recent survey found that 38% of U.S. managers noticed a decline in morale and productivity among employees due to election-related stress. If a major external event can significantly affect workplace performance, imagine the impact of ongoing personal instability. 

This is a tough one because it requires nuance. Leaders can and should be empathetic when someone is dealing with something real, but they also can’t let chronic disorganization or irresponsibility disrupt the workplace.

While these 7 most challenging employee types cover many of the most common workplace challenges, they’re far from the only ones. Every workplace is different, and no two employees are exactly alike. Some difficult behaviors are easy to categorize, while others are more nuanced. That’s why leadership isn’t about memorizing a list of employee types—it’s about recognizing patterns and knowing how to respond effectively.

Some employees are disengaged, putting in the bare minimum effort. Others resist change, pushing back on every new initiative. Some constantly criticize leadership, undermining progress instead of contributing solutions. The key isn’t labeling them—it’s identifying the real issue at play and adapting your leadership approach to address it.

At the end of the day, types are just tools to help us learn how to respond—but every employee requires a unique approach. What matters is having the skills to navigate tough conversations, reinforce accountability, and drive performance—no matter what kind of employee you’re dealing with.

Here’s what won’t solve the problem:

Here’s what actually works:

Great leadership isn’t just about fixing issues when they arise. It’s about creating a culture of accountability where feedback and high performance are the norm—so problem behaviors are less likely to take root.

If you’re looking to refine your approach, improve how you handle tough conversations, and build a stronger, more accountable team, explore our leadership resources. Whether it’s developing better communication techniques or reinforcing accountability, small improvements can lead to big shifts in your team’s performance and culture.

Start practicing the Language of Leadership with our free introductory course today!